<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Science of Recovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/09/the-science-of-recovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/09/the-science-of-recovery/</link>
	<description>Progressive approaches to science policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:53:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dr. P K Rao</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/09/the-science-of-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-6122</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. P K Rao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/?p=4497#comment-6122</guid>
		<description>Rep Rush Holt (who represents my constituency) has pointed to an urgent priority that augurs well for the need to invest in R&amp;D (both process and product aspects). The US has fallen behind a number of nations in its R&amp;D efforts during the past decade and this has to be reversed. Besides, a good proportion of R&amp;D budgets must be geared toward climate chnage aspects. An aggregate 2 to 3 percent growth in innovations-led productivity will offset much of potential losses due to climate change. However, this is not to say that a number of direct interventions are essential for mitigating climate change impacts. Rep Rush Holt can help in the later as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep Rush Holt (who represents my constituency) has pointed to an urgent priority that augurs well for the need to invest in R&amp;D (both process and product aspects). The US has fallen behind a number of nations in its R&amp;D efforts during the past decade and this has to be reversed. Besides, a good proportion of R&amp;D budgets must be geared toward climate chnage aspects. An aggregate 2 to 3 percent growth in innovations-led productivity will offset much of potential losses due to climate change. However, this is not to say that a number of direct interventions are essential for mitigating climate change impacts. Rep Rush Holt can help in the later as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
