<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Autonomous Contraception</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/08/autonomous-contraception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/08/autonomous-contraception/</link>
	<description>Progressive approaches to science policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:54:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Z</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/08/autonomous-contraception/comment-page-1/#comment-6040</link>
		<dc:creator>John Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/?p=4326#comment-6040</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article, Lisa -- and thank you for pointing out that contraceptive availability has effects on the freedom/autonomy of both women and men.

I&#039;m worried about the link between freedom/autonomy and trust, though.  Trust is treated here as a concern that should be addressed (better: a myth that should be dispelled) in the interest of getting male contraception to market.  While this seems true enough, there seems an equally important issue regarding trust: where a person&#039;s trust in her partner is unwarranted, that naive trust can often serve to undermine her autonomy.  X makes plans that involves Y doing some action; X trusts Y to do that action; Y fails to do so; X&#039;s plans don&#039;t pan out; X has lost some control over her life.

I realize, of course, that I&#039;m implicitly supporting the stereotype of women as blindly trusting their men, but doesn&#039;t the finding that 98% of women trust their partner to use contraception seem a bit, I don&#039;t know, troubling?  I was under the impression (correct me if I am incorrect) that the misuse rate of female oral contraception was somewhere on the order of 2%; one would suspect that the misuse rate of a similar device by men would be higher, assuming that men view themselves as having less to lose by failing to contracept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article, Lisa &#8212; and thank you for pointing out that contraceptive availability has effects on the freedom/autonomy of both women and men.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m worried about the link between freedom/autonomy and trust, though.  Trust is treated here as a concern that should be addressed (better: a myth that should be dispelled) in the interest of getting male contraception to market.  While this seems true enough, there seems an equally important issue regarding trust: where a person&#8217;s trust in her partner is unwarranted, that naive trust can often serve to undermine her autonomy.  X makes plans that involves Y doing some action; X trusts Y to do that action; Y fails to do so; X&#8217;s plans don&#8217;t pan out; X has lost some control over her life.</p>
<p>I realize, of course, that I&#8217;m implicitly supporting the stereotype of women as blindly trusting their men, but doesn&#8217;t the finding that 98% of women trust their partner to use contraception seem a bit, I don&#8217;t know, troubling?  I was under the impression (correct me if I am incorrect) that the misuse rate of female oral contraception was somewhere on the order of 2%; one would suspect that the misuse rate of a similar device by men would be higher, assuming that men view themselves as having less to lose by failing to contracept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/08/autonomous-contraception/comment-page-1/#comment-6034</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/?p=4326#comment-6034</guid>
		<description>Great article. Sounds promising. Speaking of fertility, my wife has been taking Clomid for a few years now, and it works great. She gets them overseas &#039;cause it&#039;s cheaper to get that stuff from places like India(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medsindialtd.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;meds india&lt;/a&gt;)and other countries who are often just as regulated as we are in the US. Anyway, this article was interesting. I&#039;m always interested in these types of progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. Sounds promising. Speaking of fertility, my wife has been taking Clomid for a few years now, and it works great. She gets them overseas &#8217;cause it&#8217;s cheaper to get that stuff from places like India(<a href="http://www.medsindialtd.com/" rel="nofollow">meds india</a>)and other countries who are often just as regulated as we are in the US. Anyway, this article was interesting. I&#8217;m always interested in these types of progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Plemmons Pratt</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/08/autonomous-contraception/comment-page-1/#comment-5994</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Plemmons Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/?p=4326#comment-5994</guid>
		<description>Zoe--
Thanks for the catch. This has been fixed.
--Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zoe&#8211;<br />
Thanks for the catch. This has been fixed.<br />
&#8211;Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoe Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/08/autonomous-contraception/comment-page-1/#comment-5969</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoe Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/?p=4326#comment-5969</guid>
		<description>I believe the protein in question here is PLC-zeta, not PLC-zena. Interesting stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the protein in question here is PLC-zeta, not PLC-zena. Interesting stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
