<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Glorious Mess</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/06/a-glorious-mess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/06/a-glorious-mess/</link>
	<description>Progressive approaches to science policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:54:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael F. Sarabia</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/06/a-glorious-mess/comment-page-1/#comment-5638</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Sarabia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/?p=3705#comment-5638</guid>
		<description>This is four steps forward and three steps back, nevertheless, it is One Giant Step Forward towards the survival of Mankind. It can be improved in four years.

In his Second Term, Pres. Obama can jack up the Carbon price to a real, meaningful level, the rest matters less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is four steps forward and three steps back, nevertheless, it is One Giant Step Forward towards the survival of Mankind. It can be improved in four years.</p>
<p>In his Second Term, Pres. Obama can jack up the Carbon price to a real, meaningful level, the rest matters less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Mattes</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/06/a-glorious-mess/comment-page-1/#comment-5568</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Mattes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/?p=3705#comment-5568</guid>
		<description>I agree with the comment above.  I know in the description above it says he analyzes the relationship between science and politics but its hard to get a real objective view on the subject when the author is biased in a major sense of the way.  So you gave us two sources of how the tax will affect Americans but you obviously think the more credible source is the one that helps our the democratic cause... This very may well be a hidden tax to help pay for the enormous debt our government is already in.  If they were really serious about changing the climate they would find a solution where is doesn&#039;t eliminate other competition in the energy field</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the comment above.  I know in the description above it says he analyzes the relationship between science and politics but its hard to get a real objective view on the subject when the author is biased in a major sense of the way.  So you gave us two sources of how the tax will affect Americans but you obviously think the more credible source is the one that helps our the democratic cause&#8230; This very may well be a hidden tax to help pay for the enormous debt our government is already in.  If they were really serious about changing the climate they would find a solution where is doesn&#8217;t eliminate other competition in the energy field</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Schwarz</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/06/a-glorious-mess/comment-page-1/#comment-5549</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Schwarz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/?p=3705#comment-5549</guid>
		<description>The public debate about climate change is a joke.  An even bigger joke is that the title of this blog is Science Progress.  How can you claim progress in science when your goals are clearly subjective and political?  I guess your luckly that the majority of the population has lost its ability to think on its own....you are all sheep...I can&#039;t imagine how that feels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The public debate about climate change is a joke.  An even bigger joke is that the title of this blog is Science Progress.  How can you claim progress in science when your goals are clearly subjective and political?  I guess your luckly that the majority of the population has lost its ability to think on its own&#8230;.you are all sheep&#8230;I can&#8217;t imagine how that feels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
