- Commissioner Enhances FDA’s Commitment to Personalized Medicine
- Perfecting Policy on Stem Cells
- NIH and FDA Aim to Retool Regulatory Science
- DOE Leads Federal Funding for a Regional Innovation Cluster
- Certainty on the Science of Climate Change
- They’re Not Perfect Cells, But They’re Model Cells
- Genomic Medicine on the March
- President’s Budget Aims to Recharge Regional Innovation
- Event: The Science of Climate Change
- Progress in Bioethics
- The Top Science Progress Features of 2009
- Science Education Progress
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Wire a Broadband Stimulus
This week, the Federal Communications Commission will begin designing a plan for improving broadband access and speeds for all Americans. The comment period for how to spend taxpayer funds on the project, which includes $7.2 billion from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, opens Wednesday; the final plan is due next February.
But as Mark Lloyd pointed out last week on Science Progress, before the government deploys billions to expand broadband infrastructure, it would be useful to have a working definition of what exactly we mean by the term. His recommendation is to design a process for an evolving definition that ensures consumers can send and receive high speed high-quality transmissions:
Let’s allow the experts to decide quickly what is broadband today, and then bring them back every two years and come up with another definition. Broadband delivery is bound to improve, so we should establish a process to recognize evolving standards to fit new technological realities. The one thing NTIA [National Telecommunications and Information Administration] should not do is what the FCC has been doing since 1996. It should not call broadband whatever is easiest for most telecommunications providers to achieve today.
In addition to incomplete definitions for communications technologies, there is also inadequate geographic information on broadband penetration across the country, a problem raised at a hearing last week. Lloyd examined the serious shortcomings of the data gathered by the NTIA last year, and noted that relying on industry numbers for access in large regions is problematic: “Declaring that access is accomplished when the industry reports that one entity in that zip-code has service does not tell us who has broadband. And 200 kilobits per second in one direction is not advanced telecommunications service.”
Effective, ubiquitous broadband is a crucial driver of economic growth, and without it, U.S. competitiveness suffers on the global stage, as these broadband rankings from the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation indicate:

Comments on this article


