<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Stem Cell Policy Founded on Ethics and Expertise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/03/new-stem-cell-policy-founded-on-ethics-and-expertise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/03/new-stem-cell-policy-founded-on-ethics-and-expertise/</link>
	<description>Progressive approaches to science policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:59:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Juan Calabasa</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/03/new-stem-cell-policy-founded-on-ethics-and-expertise/comment-page-1/#comment-4692</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Calabasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/?p=2161#comment-4692</guid>
		<description>The new ethical guidelines listed here, which are referred to as the &quot;highest ethical standards&quot;, are arbitrary determinations. They overstep what many Americans consider to be the line between acceptable research and the utilitarian exploitation of human embryos, yet those setting these guidelines deem them acceptable for all. Informed consent is mentioned but is only partially valid, for the consent of the life most directly affected- that of the human embryo- is never obtained. Good science does not harm or exploit human life, even in the pursuit of noble goals. That the embryo is defenseless and unable to weigh in on the issue does not lessen its humanity, inherent dignity, or right to the same protections afforded to others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new ethical guidelines listed here, which are referred to as the &#8220;highest ethical standards&#8221;, are arbitrary determinations. They overstep what many Americans consider to be the line between acceptable research and the utilitarian exploitation of human embryos, yet those setting these guidelines deem them acceptable for all. Informed consent is mentioned but is only partially valid, for the consent of the life most directly affected- that of the human embryo- is never obtained. Good science does not harm or exploit human life, even in the pursuit of noble goals. That the embryo is defenseless and unable to weigh in on the issue does not lessen its humanity, inherent dignity, or right to the same protections afforded to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Nichols</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/03/new-stem-cell-policy-founded-on-ethics-and-expertise/comment-page-1/#comment-4623</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nichols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/?p=2161#comment-4623</guid>
		<description>WOW we should ALL be celebrating this monumental change of course which has the potential (already demonstrated) to save tens of millions...Today science returns to its rightful place in America</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW we should ALL be celebrating this monumental change of course which has the potential (already demonstrated) to save tens of millions&#8230;Today science returns to its rightful place in America</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jensen</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/03/new-stem-cell-policy-founded-on-ethics-and-expertise/comment-page-1/#comment-4617</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/?p=2161#comment-4617</guid>
		<description>Most of this ground has been covered in agonizing and public detail at the California stem cell agency, which started work on its pioneering standards in 2005. The current policies and regulations created by CIRM can be found at its web site along with transcripts of all its proceedings. Look for the Standards Working Group meetings, along with selected transcripts from the ICOC, the CIRM board of directors. Here is the url for the website: cirm.ca.gov</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of this ground has been covered in agonizing and public detail at the California stem cell agency, which started work on its pioneering standards in 2005. The current policies and regulations created by CIRM can be found at its web site along with transcripts of all its proceedings. Look for the Standards Working Group meetings, along with selected transcripts from the ICOC, the CIRM board of directors. Here is the url for the website: cirm.ca.gov</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
