- Dirty Water: Mapping Projected Climate Change Impacts in the United States and Abroad
- Money and Methods in Cancer Research
- Report Details How Climate Change Will Spark Heat Waves, Increase the Spread of Disease, and Erode Coastal Economies
- FDA Looks to Open Up the Medicine Cabinet
- NIH Funding is Good for Your Health, and It’s Good for the Economy
- Progressive Science Values
- Climate Change Will Not Be Kind to American Water and Agriculture
- Less Philosophy, More Policy: Obama Disbands Council on Bioethics and Will Create New One
- The Digital Textbook Case
- The Worn Grooves of Disciplinary Research
- NIH By the Numbers: Challenge Grants, Stem Cell Comments, and Conflict of Interest Rules
- States Are Looking to Grow Their Biotech Sectors
Stem Cell Recommendations for the New Administration
University of Wisconsin-Madison
A colony of undifferentiated embryonic stem cells.
Rick Weiss outlines a framework for a new federal policy that supports funding human embryonic stem cell research over on the CAP website. He writes that within the first week of taking office, President Obama “should call upon the Department of Health and Human Services and the National Institutes of Health to devise a plan for dismantling the current, overly restrictive Bush administration policy on the funding of human embryonic stem cell research.”
Within 90 days, he argues, NIH and HHS should have regulations in place for federal support of research involving ethically derived hESCs with these restrictions:
- The cells must have been derived from embryos produced for reproductive purposes.
- Those embryos must have been deemed in excess of medical need, were no longer being considered for transfer to a womb, and were slated for destruction.
- The embryos were freely donated by both of the adults who contributed genetic material to create them, as evidenced by proper written informed consent.
- No financial inducements were offered to donors, and the donors expressed through an informed consent process their understanding that any resulting cell lines will be used for research and not for the development of therapeutic benefits for the donors.
- All federally funded research on human embryonic stem cells must be conducted under the review of a Stem Cell Research Oversight committee that adheres to the standards put forth in the guidelines of either the National Academies or the International Society for Stem Cell Research.
Read the full outline for the policy recommendation here.
Comments on this article
After all the work to date, stem cells looks like a mirage, with a dollar link.
December 9th, 2008 at 11:01 pmConsider two facts:
1. To date, there is not even a hypothesis on how they work. The work is Euristic, a “trial and error and hope” work with no theory behind it to reflect basic understanding.
2. To date, the results do not justify investments. If it did, private companies would be racing for the big profits. Now, only Potential, promise, hope and Potential, lots of them and little else.
With all the problems out there…
Did you know that vitamins have proven ineffective to avoid many illnesses that were, loudly, proclaimed to have the “potential” to give some immunity. Results showed nothing of that sort. And, that was vitamins.
Are we so scared of illness or death that we will pursue anything that has potential, hope or promise?
And, ignore helping the poor, homeless and sick?
We need better priorities than to persue a holy grail, over and over.