- FDA Rules for Cigarettes Are a Victory for Public Health, for Science (and for the Earth’s Climate?)
- Legislation Introduced to Codify Stem Cell Rules
- Commissioner Enhances FDA’s Commitment to Personalized Medicine
- Perfecting Policy on Stem Cells
- NIH and FDA Aim to Retool Regulatory Science
- DOE Leads Federal Funding for a Regional Innovation Cluster
- Certainty on the Science of Climate Change
- They’re Not Perfect Cells, But They’re Model Cells
- Genomic Medicine on the March
- President’s Budget Aims to Recharge Regional Innovation
- Event: The Science of Climate Change
- Progress in Bioethics
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Stem Cell Recommendations for the New Administration
University of Wisconsin-Madison
A colony of undifferentiated embryonic stem cells.
Rick Weiss outlines a framework for a new federal policy that supports funding human embryonic stem cell research over on the CAP website. He writes that within the first week of taking office, President Obama “should call upon the Department of Health and Human Services and the National Institutes of Health to devise a plan for dismantling the current, overly restrictive Bush administration policy on the funding of human embryonic stem cell research.”
Within 90 days, he argues, NIH and HHS should have regulations in place for federal support of research involving ethically derived hESCs with these restrictions:
- The cells must have been derived from embryos produced for reproductive purposes.
- Those embryos must have been deemed in excess of medical need, were no longer being considered for transfer to a womb, and were slated for destruction.
- The embryos were freely donated by both of the adults who contributed genetic material to create them, as evidenced by proper written informed consent.
- No financial inducements were offered to donors, and the donors expressed through an informed consent process their understanding that any resulting cell lines will be used for research and not for the development of therapeutic benefits for the donors.
- All federally funded research on human embryonic stem cells must be conducted under the review of a Stem Cell Research Oversight committee that adheres to the standards put forth in the guidelines of either the National Academies or the International Society for Stem Cell Research.
Read the full outline for the policy recommendation here.
Comments on this article
After all the work to date, stem cells looks like a mirage, with a dollar link.
December 9th, 2008 at 11:01 pmConsider two facts:
1. To date, there is not even a hypothesis on how they work. The work is Euristic, a “trial and error and hope” work with no theory behind it to reflect basic understanding.
2. To date, the results do not justify investments. If it did, private companies would be racing for the big profits. Now, only Potential, promise, hope and Potential, lots of them and little else.
With all the problems out there…
Did you know that vitamins have proven ineffective to avoid many illnesses that were, loudly, proclaimed to have the “potential” to give some immunity. Results showed nothing of that sort. And, that was vitamins.
Are we so scared of illness or death that we will pursue anything that has potential, hope or promise?
And, ignore helping the poor, homeless and sick?
We need better priorities than to persue a holy grail, over and over.