- Dirty Water: Mapping Projected Climate Change Impacts in the United States and Abroad
- Money and Methods in Cancer Research
- Report Details How Climate Change Will Spark Heat Waves, Increase the Spread of Disease, and Erode Coastal Economies
- FDA Looks to Open Up the Medicine Cabinet
- NIH Funding is Good for Your Health, and It’s Good for the Economy
- Progressive Science Values
- Climate Change Will Not Be Kind to American Water and Agriculture
- Less Philosophy, More Policy: Obama Disbands Council on Bioethics and Will Create New One
- The Digital Textbook Case
- The Worn Grooves of Disciplinary Research
- NIH By the Numbers: Challenge Grants, Stem Cell Comments, and Conflict of Interest Rules
- States Are Looking to Grow Their Biotech Sectors
CNN Decides It Can Cover Science Without Dedicated Science Reporters
From Curtis Brainard at the CJR Observatory blog:
CNN, the Cable News Network, announced yesterday that it will cut its entire science, technology, and environment news staff, including Miles O’Brien, its chief technology and environment correspondent, as well as six executive producers.
The move seems strange and unfortunate given the ever-increasing role that scientific and technological issues play in shaping political and economic life in the United States.
Brainard rounds up a cohort of experts who are “dishearted” or “baffled” by the decision, particularly given CNN’s own admission that the move came not because the network fell on hard times. In fact, they’re doing just fine. He quotes CNN spokesperson Barbara Levin: “We want to integrate environmental, science and technology reporting into the general editorial structure rather than have a stand alone unit.”
Chris Mooney lamented the economic woes that are depleting the science staffs at newspapers throughout the United States and Canada in a recent column—and in particular the fact that in many instances, newspapers hear not a peep of complaint when they eliminate science coverage.
It should go without saying that science and technology are vital to the health, wealth, safety, and prosperity of everyone. If you think CNN should devote resources to covering those issues, here’s their feedback page.
Comments on this article
With quality science news coverage diminishing across traditional media outlets, new efforts are needed to reach Americans when it comes to communicating science.
The National Academies is currently surveying members of the public to identify the topics in science, engineering, and medicine that matter most to them. A suite of engaging educational materials (both print and web-based) and other outreach acitivities will be developed around those topics that are the most popular. These materials alone won’t solve the communication gap, but they will go toward breaking down the complexities of today’s top science, engineering, and medical issues.
Readers can voice their own opinions here:
http://www.surveygizmo.com/s/85927/what-matters-most-to-you-c
December 4th, 2008 at 5:02 pm