- Legislation Introduced to Codify Stem Cell Rules
- Commissioner Enhances FDA’s Commitment to Personalized Medicine
- Perfecting Policy on Stem Cells
- NIH and FDA Aim to Retool Regulatory Science
- DOE Leads Federal Funding for a Regional Innovation Cluster
- Certainty on the Science of Climate Change
- They’re Not Perfect Cells, But They’re Model Cells
- Genomic Medicine on the March
- President’s Budget Aims to Recharge Regional Innovation
- Event: The Science of Climate Change
- Progress in Bioethics
- The Top Science Progress Features of 2009
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Cabinet-making Advice from the Association of American Universities
A couple of weeks ago, the Association of American Universities, a nonprofit representing 62 of the largest and most influential research institutions in the United States, released its policy recommendations for the next president. The recommendations straddle the sciences and the humanities, but the item at the top of the group’s list is the very same as the top recommendation from the National Academy of Sciences: elevate the role of the president’s science adviser and director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy to a cabinet-level position, and appoint a highly qualified person to that position quickly.
Chris Mooney explained in this week’s column, “All the President’s Scientists,” that speed and effectiveness matter, and that’s part of why the tone of the NAS recommendations has changed over the years:
The Bush administration did not appoint an influential, cabinet-level science adviser, and certainly did not appoint its senior science adviser promptly. It was, in fact, the slowest administration ever to fill the top 500 positions in government, according to the Brookings Institution, and left many science-related agencies (such as the Food and Drug Administration) leaderless for significant periods of time.
The message from the AAU seems clear: Appointing an effective adviser as “First Scientist” right away won’t just make federal scientists happy—it will help support the country’s entire research infrastructure.
Comments on this article



Hello, I can’t understand how to add your blog in my rss reader
March 10th, 2009 at 3:08 pm————————
internet signature: http://auto-car-loan.xetisa.ru/