<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wild West of Reproductive Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/08/the-wild-west-of-reproductive-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/08/the-wild-west-of-reproductive-technology/</link>
	<description>Progressive approaches to science policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:45:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Mazzaschi</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/08/the-wild-west-of-reproductive-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2563</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Mazzaschi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/08/the-wild-west-of-reproductive-technology/#comment-2563</guid>
		<description>In an effort to fill the federal void, the National Academies of Sciences formed a Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Advisory Committee.  The guidelines developed by this panel are likely to form the basis for any new federal stem cell research guidleines.  I am surprised Mr. Weiss did not note them since they have largely been embraced by the research community, including private funders, research institutions, and journal editors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an effort to fill the federal void, the National Academies of Sciences formed a Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Advisory Committee.  The guidelines developed by this panel are likely to form the basis for any new federal stem cell research guidleines.  I am surprised Mr. Weiss did not note them since they have largely been embraced by the research community, including private funders, research institutions, and journal editors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zane Selvans</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/08/the-wild-west-of-reproductive-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2559</link>
		<dc:creator>Zane Selvans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/08/the-wild-west-of-reproductive-technology/#comment-2559</guid>
		<description>&quot;Undoubtedly fall short&quot; seems possibly a little harsh.  Didn&#039;t Arthur C. Clarke say something to the effect of &quot;We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run&quot;.  We&#039;re still in the very short run here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Undoubtedly fall short&#8221; seems possibly a little harsh.  Didn&#8217;t Arthur C. Clarke say something to the effect of &#8220;We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run&#8221;.  We&#8217;re still in the very short run here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
