- Science and Tech Policy Events Next Week
- A Good Week for Vaccine News
- You Might Be Eating Clones
- Spore: A Video Game About Evolving
- End-of-the-Week Links
- Downer Cows Out of Burgers Is Good, but as for the Rest of the Food Safety System…
- Cell Reprogramming Leaves the Test Tube
- The Closing Bell
- Without Better Calculations, It’s Just Carbon “Toe Prints”
- Vaccine Exemptions Drive Measles Rates to 12-Year High
- Better Learning Through Video Games
- MO Woes
Program to Help Developing Nations Forecast Natural Disasters Loses Funding
This post contains a correction.
The National Center for Atmospheric Research has shut down a $500,000 program that helps developing nations predict and prepare for natural disasters such as droughts, floods, and cyclones, Andrew Revkin reports in The New York Times. The program, called the Center for Capacity Building, was created in 2004.
AP/NASA
Cyclone Nargis as it approaches the coast of Bangladesh.
The program served a critical need for poor nations that lack the forecasting infrastructure to accurately predict or sufficiently prepare for natural disasters that ravage their population, cripple weak economies, and destroy food and water supplies.
Writing recently about the “Staggering Cyclone Nargis Catastrophe,” Chris Mooney argued that effective warning systems and evacuation plans have been effective:
Although the Yucatan and Central America got smacked by back-to-back Category 5 storms [in 2003]—Hurricanes Dean and Felix were both far more powerful, meteorologically, than Cyclones Sidr and Nargis—the combined death toll was only 162. That’s because nations like Mexico, Nicaragua, and Honduras warned their populations and, in some cases, evacuated people in vulnerable areas.
Cyclone Nargis, by comparison, claimed the lives of 138,000 people in Bangladesh. Accurate forecasting and disaster preparedness , which the Center for Capacity Building sought to implement, can save lives.
According to Revkin, the Center for Capacity Building was primarily funded by the National Science Foundation, and was shut down due to “shrinking federal science budgets.” A recent supplemental appropriations bill for various scientific organizations, including NSF, is not sufficient to sustain essential scientific programs, and federal scientific budgets should be further increased.
Correction: This post misstated the funding for the Center for Capacity Building as $500 million; it is $500,000
Comments on this article


Just for the record, the program had an annual budget of $500,000, not $500 million. : )
August 7th, 2008 at 6:24 pmMore related news here:
http://tinyurl.com/heat-floods-nytimes