- Dirty Water: Mapping Projected Climate Change Impacts in the United States and Abroad
- Money and Methods in Cancer Research
- Report Details How Climate Change Will Spark Heat Waves, Increase the Spread of Disease, and Erode Coastal Economies
- FDA Looks to Open Up the Medicine Cabinet
- NIH Funding is Good for Your Health, and It’s Good for the Economy
- Progressive Science Values
- Climate Change Will Not Be Kind to American Water and Agriculture
- Less Philosophy, More Policy: Obama Disbands Council on Bioethics and Will Create New One
- The Digital Textbook Case
- The Worn Grooves of Disciplinary Research
- NIH By the Numbers: Challenge Grants, Stem Cell Comments, and Conflict of Interest Rules
- States Are Looking to Grow Their Biotech Sectors
Program to Help Developing Nations Forecast Natural Disasters Loses Funding
This post contains a correction.
The National Center for Atmospheric Research has shut down a $500,000 program that helps developing nations predict and prepare for natural disasters such as droughts, floods, and cyclones, Andrew Revkin reports in The New York Times. The program, called the Center for Capacity Building, was created in 2004.
AP/NASA
Cyclone Nargis as it approaches the coast of Bangladesh.
The program served a critical need for poor nations that lack the forecasting infrastructure to accurately predict or sufficiently prepare for natural disasters that ravage their population, cripple weak economies, and destroy food and water supplies.
Writing recently about the “Staggering Cyclone Nargis Catastrophe,” Chris Mooney argued that effective warning systems and evacuation plans have been effective:
Although the Yucatan and Central America got smacked by back-to-back Category 5 storms [in 2003]—Hurricanes Dean and Felix were both far more powerful, meteorologically, than Cyclones Sidr and Nargis—the combined death toll was only 162. That’s because nations like Mexico, Nicaragua, and Honduras warned their populations and, in some cases, evacuated people in vulnerable areas.
Cyclone Nargis, by comparison, claimed the lives of 138,000 people in Bangladesh. Accurate forecasting and disaster preparedness , which the Center for Capacity Building sought to implement, can save lives.
According to Revkin, the Center for Capacity Building was primarily funded by the National Science Foundation, and was shut down due to “shrinking federal science budgets.” A recent supplemental appropriations bill for various scientific organizations, including NSF, is not sufficient to sustain essential scientific programs, and federal scientific budgets should be further increased.
Correction: This post misstated the funding for the Center for Capacity Building as $500 million; it is $500,000
Comments on this article
Just for the record, the program had an annual budget of $500,000, not $500 million. : )
August 7th, 2008 at 6:24 pmMore related news here:
http://tinyurl.com/heat-floods-nytimes