- Dirty Water: Mapping Projected Climate Change Impacts in the United States and Abroad
- Money and Methods in Cancer Research
- Report Details How Climate Change Will Spark Heat Waves, Increase the Spread of Disease, and Erode Coastal Economies
- FDA Looks to Open Up the Medicine Cabinet
- NIH Funding is Good for Your Health, and It’s Good for the Economy
- Progressive Science Values
- Climate Change Will Not Be Kind to American Water and Agriculture
- Less Philosophy, More Policy: Obama Disbands Council on Bioethics and Will Create New One
- The Digital Textbook Case
- The Worn Grooves of Disciplinary Research
- NIH By the Numbers: Challenge Grants, Stem Cell Comments, and Conflict of Interest Rules
- States Are Looking to Grow Their Biotech Sectors
Bruce Schneier on ID Security
In the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States, the number of ID checks in American life has climbed sharply. Some advocate more intrusive identification systems to fight terrorism and limit immigration, while others are skeptical of new procedures for verifying identity because of the impact they may have on costs, computer security, privacy, and civil liberties. The growing “ID Divide” presents significant policy question as technological advances outpace the government’s ability to protect its citizens.
Bruce Schneier, a leading security technologist, addresses these technical limitations. According to Schneier, the databases connected to identification cards are the source of the problem, not the cards themselves, as no ID can be more secure than the procedures used to operate the underlying database. Even individuals authorized to access these systems have queried the databases for unauthorized purposes, so we know that the threats to individual personal information are significant. Schneier also suggests that IDs cannot distinguish “evildoers” from other citizens; therefore, we must find ways to close security gaps and simultaneously protect individual privacy.
Comments on this article
