- Change for America on Science and Tech Policy: Part 1
- Taking a Short Break
- Transition Team Deploys Its First Public Web 2.0 Tools
- Victory for Stem Cells in Michigan
- White Open Spaces
- Historical Election Maps and Open Mapping Research
- Scary Regulatory Maneuvers in Bush’s Last Days
- FDA Did Not Finish Its Homework On BPA
- Digital Freedom of Expression and Human Rights
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Helmet Design
- Gates Foundation Funds Research, Venture Capital Style
- A Brief History of Lead Regulation
Better Scientific Advice for Lawmakers
A recent tongue-in-cheek New York Times article describing the struggles of Congress’ three physicists sheds light on a notable hole in the nation’s legislative population—the lack of scientists. Generous estimates count only 30 scientists among the 535 Congressional members. That’s a mere 5.6 percent of our nation’s lawmakers that come from a scientific background. When so many pressing issues directly involve science—stem cell research, nuclear energy, and global climate change, to name a few—how is this possible?
Last Thursday, Congressman Rush Holt (D-NJ), one of the aforementioned three physicists, appeared at the Washington D.C. chapter of Student Pugwash USA for an event on “Science, Technology, and the 2008 Elections.” He spoke of a dire need for scientists on Capital Hill. He also spoke of his own efforts to facilitate discussions between Congress and top scientists. One of his main projects is to revive the de-funded Office of Technology Assessment, which was dissolved in 1995. The OTA was a bipartisan group designed to directly inform Congress about the scientific implications of their policy decisions. Holt said that Congress, under then-Speaker Newt Gingrich, voted to disband the OTA because they could “just go to their neighborhood professor.” Laughing, he said this amounted to a “self-imposed Congressional lobotomy.”
Science Progress Contributing Editor Chris Mooney wrote in support of Congressman Holt’s revival efforts earlier this year: “The need for OTA has only become more apparent, not less, over time, as policymakers see more and more that many political issues have inescapable technical components.” To make critical policy decisions about climate change, health care, and the future of innovation in the United States, lawmakers need the best scientific advice, whether it comes from their colleagues, from outside experts, or from Congressional researchers.
Comments on this article