- Commissioner Enhances FDA’s Commitment to Personalized Medicine
- Perfecting Policy on Stem Cells
- NIH and FDA Aim to Retool Regulatory Science
- DOE Leads Federal Funding for a Regional Innovation Cluster
- Certainty on the Science of Climate Change
- They’re Not Perfect Cells, But They’re Model Cells
- Genomic Medicine on the March
- President’s Budget Aims to Recharge Regional Innovation
- Event: The Science of Climate Change
- Progress in Bioethics
- The Top Science Progress Features of 2009
- Science Education Progress
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
If You Didn’t Write the Article, Why Are You Listed as an Author?
From the Chronicle comes news of a study showing some academic scientists may be adding their names (subscription) as authors to papers authored by corporations. The study—published in the Journal of the American Medical Association—suggests the practice maybe all too common in medical journals.
According to the Chronicle, researchers conducting the study searched a database of millions of court documents provided by Merck for liability cases involving its drug Vioxx, which was pulled from the market because of safety concerns. They found that papers reporting clinical trial results seemed to be written by Merck employees, only to have the names of academic authors added later.
The report includes an editorial by the editor-in-chief and executive deputy editor of JAMA, condemning such ghostwriting as “unprofessional and demeaning to the medical profession and to scientific research.” The editorial includes new guidelines to prevent such behavior: in particular, it calls for authors to disclose any financial conflicts of interest to their supervisors.
The study adds to the growing list (subscription) of recent similar breaches of scientific integrity. A clear and simple conflict of interest standard adopted by all scientific journals could go a long way to preventing future conflicts like this.
Comments on this article


