- Legislation Introduced to Codify Stem Cell Rules
- Commissioner Enhances FDA’s Commitment to Personalized Medicine
- Perfecting Policy on Stem Cells
- NIH and FDA Aim to Retool Regulatory Science
- DOE Leads Federal Funding for a Regional Innovation Cluster
- Certainty on the Science of Climate Change
- They’re Not Perfect Cells, But They’re Model Cells
- Genomic Medicine on the March
- President’s Budget Aims to Recharge Regional Innovation
- Event: The Science of Climate Change
- Progress in Bioethics
- The Top Science Progress Features of 2009
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
EPA Employees Would Like to Have Their Science Recognized
The Washington Post reports that unions at the Environmental Protection Agency have broken with management over Administrator Stephen Johnson’s disregard for scientific integrity. The news comes only a two weeks after Johnson published the official explanation for the agency’s refusal to allow California’s emissions reduction standards, despite the fact that the ruling ignored the “unanimous recommendation of the EPA’s legal and technical staffs.”
Eighteen states pledged or planned to adopt California’s emissions standards in an effort to curb global warming. The denial only continues the Bush Administration’s foot-dragging approach to global warming, as Center for American Progress Senior fellow Robert Sussman explained in a recent column.
The Post reports that union leaders and employees cited decisions on fluoride drinking-water standards and mercury emissions from power plants as further instances in which the management flagrantly disregarded the Agency’s own standards for scientific integrity. As Chris Mooney pointed out in a column on a recent juridical rebuke of the mercury decision, the calculated dismissal of scientific evidence damages the entire decision-making process and exposes citizens and the environment to harmful pollutants. While the regrettable decisions of the current EPA management will likely be reversed in the not-too-distant future, the damage to the integrity of data-driven decision making and the scientific community is a scar that may linger.
Comments on this article
