- Commissioner Enhances FDA’s Commitment to Personalized Medicine
- Perfecting Policy on Stem Cells
- NIH and FDA Aim to Retool Regulatory Science
- DOE Leads Federal Funding for a Regional Innovation Cluster
- Certainty on the Science of Climate Change
- They’re Not Perfect Cells, But They’re Model Cells
- Genomic Medicine on the March
- President’s Budget Aims to Recharge Regional Innovation
- Event: The Science of Climate Change
- Progress in Bioethics
- The Top Science Progress Features of 2009
- Science Education Progress
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Britain Gets Creative About Innovation
British politician Gordon Brown has always been keen on creating innovation in his nation’s economy, convinced that UK universities and businesses together can create new technologies and services that will boost economic growth. Now that he’s prime minister of the United Kingdom, he’s moving swiftly to act on those inclinations—with possible lessons for the United States.
This week’s issue of the National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship includes a brief summation of Prime Minister Brown’s plan—which is contained in his proposed budget for the nation—as well as links to a new report from the UK’s National Endowment for Science, Technology, and the Arts that “reviews the latest thinking on the linkages between creative industries and the broader innovation economy.”
The newsletter, published by The Public Forum Institute’s NDE program, based in Washington, D.C., points to the “twenty-six different commitments where various British government agencies and other partners will act to support creative sectors.” The newsletter also points to Britain’s Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills “Innovation Nation” paper (recently highlighted here on Science Progress). The Department is tag-teaming with Brown’s new budget plans by requiring other UK government agencies to develop an “innovation procurement plan” to support innovation, “innovation vouchers” to help start-up companies tap universities for ideas to commercialize, and a new Public Services Innovation Laboratory.
Science Progress contributor James Turner has highlighted the need for a similar public sector emphasis on innovation in his column, “21st Century Government: The Next Big Thing,” and in a longer paper titled The Next Innovation Revolution: Laying the Groundwork for the United States.” Britain’s innovation program may be well worth examining, too.
Comments on this article


