- Legislation Introduced to Codify Stem Cell Rules
- Commissioner Enhances FDA’s Commitment to Personalized Medicine
- Perfecting Policy on Stem Cells
- NIH and FDA Aim to Retool Regulatory Science
- DOE Leads Federal Funding for a Regional Innovation Cluster
- Certainty on the Science of Climate Change
- They’re Not Perfect Cells, But They’re Model Cells
- Genomic Medicine on the March
- President’s Budget Aims to Recharge Regional Innovation
- Event: The Science of Climate Change
- Progress in Bioethics
- The Top Science Progress Features of 2009
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Redrawing The Maps Of The Ocean Floor
Under Article 76 of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, nations have rights to ocean floor on the continental shelf within 200 nautical miles of their shores. But countries can petition the commission that oversees the UNCLOS to extend that range based on “natural prolongations” of the continental shelf—a process as confusing as it sounds, given the vague construction of the provision and the commission’s secretive deliberations. Based on oceanographic information submitted by nations making claims to underwater territory, the commission redraws maps of the sea floor.
One hundred and fifty-five countries have ratified the treaty, but the Senate has repeatedly ignored the convention despite a successful 1994 re-negotiation altering deep-sea mining rules first opposed by the Reagan administration. An isolationist attitude in the Senate against the international law—which the defense sector, the oil and gas industry, and environmental groups all agree should be ratified—has prevailed despite the fact that the U.S. has been complying with the treaty’s provisions for decades.
In extensive coverage, Nature (subscription) explains the geology underlying the Russian claim that the Lomonosov ridge that extends under the Arctic sea is one such “natural prolongation,” despite the fact that territory claimed by the country extends hundreds of nautical miles beyond its established exclusive economic zone. During an August 2007 expedition—possibly to gather samples in support of the claim—a Russian Mir submarine planted a flag on the ocean floor, grabbing international headlines and igniting debate about national sovereignty over the Arctic sea floor. Shortly afterwards, the U.S., Canada, Denmark, and Norway made claims to territory under the Arctic waves—and the Senate convened hearings on UNCLOS.
Seed Magazine coverage points out that ratification would give the U.S. sovereign claim to resources including “an estimated value of $1.3 trillion in minerals, oil, and fish.” But oceanographers are also concerned about the ecological impact of drilling and mining that will tear trenches in the floor and pump oil back to shore. Moreover, much of the Earth’s oceans remain unexplored and uncharted. Ratification of the UNCLOS would allow the U.S. to help preserve new frontiers for scientific exploration and conservation before mining companies plant their flags.
Image credit: UT Perry-Castaneda Library
Comments on this article


