- Commissioner Enhances FDA’s Commitment to Personalized Medicine
- Perfecting Policy on Stem Cells
- NIH and FDA Aim to Retool Regulatory Science
- DOE Leads Federal Funding for a Regional Innovation Cluster
- Certainty on the Science of Climate Change
- They’re Not Perfect Cells, But They’re Model Cells
- Genomic Medicine on the March
- President’s Budget Aims to Recharge Regional Innovation
- Event: The Science of Climate Change
- Progress in Bioethics
- The Top Science Progress Features of 2009
- Science Education Progress
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Global Trends in Energy Policy and Research Spending
A New York Times article, in anticipation of a new European Union energy policy this week, reviews efforts by various European governments to revise their biofuel subsidies to adapt to unanticipated consequences of their original policies. Those policies have encouraged manufacturers to select biofuels on the basis of their market price, rather than on their environmental effect. The old policies have also encouraged farmers to sell food crops as fuel, which has raised food prices in Europe. The article notes that corn ethanol in the United States may not meet new European standards for “sustainability.” Given the EU’s unparalleled regulatory influence on global commerce, there may be significant changes in biofuel production in coming years.
Earlier, we reported on the National Science Foundation’s latest report on the state of scientific education and research in the U.S. Subsequently, Nature has highlighted some of the report’s comparative statistics on an international scale. Israel leads the world in terms of the fraction of its gross domestic product devoted to civilian research and development. In the last two years, South Korea and Switzerland have moved ahead of the United States by the same measure, and China—though it spends only 1.34 per cent on civilian research—now ranks third in the world in total civilian research and development spending.
But comparing national statistics only gets us so far. A new report from The Climate Group, titled “Low Carbon Leader: States and Regions” (pdf), focuses on sub-national initiatives to combat climate change. The report focuses on regions like California and the Western Cape of South Africa that have led the world in their progressive responses to climate change. “Sub-national governments, many of whom have globally significant economies in their own right, can also have a globally significant impact on climate change mitigation due to their unique position of influence on citizens and national governments,” said The Climate Group CEO Steve Howard (via Gristmill).
Image: flickr.com/mirkogarufi
Comments on this article
