- Commissioner Enhances FDA’s Commitment to Personalized Medicine
- Perfecting Policy on Stem Cells
- NIH and FDA Aim to Retool Regulatory Science
- DOE Leads Federal Funding for a Regional Innovation Cluster
- Certainty on the Science of Climate Change
- They’re Not Perfect Cells, But They’re Model Cells
- Genomic Medicine on the March
- President’s Budget Aims to Recharge Regional Innovation
- Event: The Science of Climate Change
- Progress in Bioethics
- The Top Science Progress Features of 2009
- Science Education Progress
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Diversity Powers Innovation, Economy
According to the mathematics of innovation, one plus one often equals three. Economic research on the creative power of groups demonstrates that teams composed of smart people alone may not generate innovative solutions to technical problems. According to Scott Page, Professor of Complex Systems, Political Science, and Economics at the University of Michigan, diversity within those groups leads to a diversity of problem-solving approaches and drives the power to innovate. Today’s Science Times features an interview with Page, who is an advisory board member for Science Progress, on his recent book on diversity, The Difference.
Each individual in a group brings his or her own problem solving perspectives, termed heuristics, to their work. One group of well-educated individuals from similar backgrounds, each with a similar set of heuristics, may posses fewer total problem solving perspectives than another more diverse group where individuals bring heuristics from different backgrounds and life experiences. As Page explained in a column for the Center for American Progress, the more diverse group has more problem-solving tools at its disposal, and therefore more power to design solutions. Moreover, those diverse perspectives can be super-adative. “What the model showed was that diverse groups of problem solvers outperformed the groups of the best individuals at solving problems,” he explains in today’s interview, “The reason: the diverse groups got stuck less often than the smart individuals, who tended to think similarly.”
Page argued in an October Science Progress column that investing in research alone will not unleash the full capabilities of the U.S. science and technology workforce. Rather, he suggested, the government can encourage more effective innovation through interdisciplinary research programs; with support for scholars from underrepresented groups; by funding more high-risk research projects, even if some of them fail; and by financing multiple solutions to big problems. As he told the NYT, “Breakthroughs in science increasingly come from teams of bright, diverse people. That’s why interdisciplinary work is the biggest trend in scientific research.”
Comments on this article
