- FDA Rules for Cigarettes Are a Victory for Public Health, for Science (and for the Earth’s Climate?)
- Legislation Introduced to Codify Stem Cell Rules
- Commissioner Enhances FDA’s Commitment to Personalized Medicine
- Perfecting Policy on Stem Cells
- NIH and FDA Aim to Retool Regulatory Science
- DOE Leads Federal Funding for a Regional Innovation Cluster
- Certainty on the Science of Climate Change
- They’re Not Perfect Cells, But They’re Model Cells
- Genomic Medicine on the March
- President’s Budget Aims to Recharge Regional Innovation
- Event: The Science of Climate Change
- Progress in Bioethics
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Missouri Matters: The State of Stem Cells
Protesters against the 2006 stem cell initiative.
Source: AP.
Cures Without Cloning, a Missouri group that opposes embryonic stem cell research, is trying to overturn the results of last year’s ballot initiative that amended the Missouri state constitution to protect stem cell research in the state. The CAP Bioethics Initiative posted an update last week. Here’s a roundup of the latest:
The Columbia Tribune reports on CWC’s dismal efforts at raising funds. The group currently has “$2,020 in cash contributions and $12,105 in debt.” The pro-embryonic stem cell research group, Coalition for Lifesaving Cures raised $587,656 in September.
With regard to the Missouri Secretary of State’s wording of the ballot question, the Kansas City Star has no problem with it, maintaining that, “[i]t is wrong to equate creating a ball of about 300 cells in a lab dish to the cloning of a human being in a woman’s uterus.”
Both CWC and CLC have aired their grievances with the ballot language by filing lawsuits. According to the Columbia Tribune, CWC contends that the ballot language is inaccurate, misleading, biased, and infringes on their free speech rights. CLC claims that the title of the summary, “The Missouri Cures Without Cloning Initiative,” is unnecessary because it amounts to a second summary. CLC says that instead of claiming the initiative will have a “significant negative fiscal impact,” the initiative should have the actual amounts it would cost the state and local governments, which are at least $200 million and $25 million respectively. The Kansas City Business Journal has additional details on the financial impact of the ballot and how it factors into the lawsuits.
St. Louis Post-Dispatch columnist Bill McClellan supports embryonic stem cells, but still finds the ballot language misleading.
Comments on this article
I saw the crowd gathered at 47th and Rockhill in KC for the picture above, on the back of one sign carried by a young girl was a swastika with a red circle and slash through it, like they actually were comparing scientists to nazis. First that tells you how absurd these protesters are in there comparison of science to hitler, but to have a young child carry it for you? come on…
October 23rd, 2007 at 4:44 pmI find it pathetic that people are even having this discussion. When adult stem cells have already been used in numerous clincal trial ranging from heart disease to liver failure, why are people making such a big deal about embryonic stem cells?? If you go to the cellmedicine site and watch the videos there, then you will understand why adult stem cells are the ONLY way to go and this whole issue is just a big distraction !
October 24th, 2007 at 2:13 am