- Commissioner Enhances FDA’s Commitment to Personalized Medicine
- Perfecting Policy on Stem Cells
- NIH and FDA Aim to Retool Regulatory Science
- DOE Leads Federal Funding for a Regional Innovation Cluster
- Certainty on the Science of Climate Change
- They’re Not Perfect Cells, But They’re Model Cells
- Genomic Medicine on the March
- President’s Budget Aims to Recharge Regional Innovation
- Event: The Science of Climate Change
- Progress in Bioethics
- The Top Science Progress Features of 2009
- Science Education Progress
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
InterAcademies Council Presents Sustainable Energy As Moral Imperative
The InterAcademies Council report released Monday on sustainable energy options reiterates familiar suggestions for greening the planet’s energy future (improve efficiency, sequester CO2, develop renewable energy sources), but it also presents a compelling argument for applied scientific and technological research in pursuit of the common good.
The first conclusion outlined in the executive summary of the report, Lighting the Way: Toward a Sustainable Energy Future, reads:
Meeting the basic energy needs of the poorest people on this planet is a moral and social imperative that can and must be pursued in concert with sustainability objectives.
Placing the interests of the developing world at the forefront of a major international report on sustainable energy is an emphatic statement that science policy should promote the equity, safety, and health of everyone.
These considerations should not be limited to discussions of climate change and green energy. In the summer edition of Issues in Science and Technology, Daniel Sarewitz notes that much discussion of U.S. science policy dwells on “how much” funding goes to different programs and does not ask “what for.” Particularly in the legislative season of appropriations bills, scientists and policy makers alike may focus on the “how much” questions. But in many situations, the more appropriate questions may be some of those Sarewitz suggests, including, “Who is most likely to benefit from the translation of the research into social outcomes?” and “Who is unlikely to benefit?”
Science (subscription) notes that the emphasis in Lighting the Way on developing nations may galvanize support for the recommendations in Washington D.C. If the report does drive policy decisions on sustainable energy, then it can also frame other questions, large and small, about how applied science and technology can make the world a more equitable place.
Comments on this article
