- FDA Rules for Cigarettes Are a Victory for Public Health, for Science (and for the Earth’s Climate?)
- Legislation Introduced to Codify Stem Cell Rules
- Commissioner Enhances FDA’s Commitment to Personalized Medicine
- Perfecting Policy on Stem Cells
- NIH and FDA Aim to Retool Regulatory Science
- DOE Leads Federal Funding for a Regional Innovation Cluster
- Certainty on the Science of Climate Change
- They’re Not Perfect Cells, But They’re Model Cells
- Genomic Medicine on the March
- President’s Budget Aims to Recharge Regional Innovation
- Event: The Science of Climate Change
- Progress in Bioethics
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Coordinating STEM Education At the National Level
The National Science Board released a plan on October 1 for the national coordination of science, engineering, technology, and mathematics education. Despite congressional support for the plan, critics counter that federal coordination could trample local educational autonomy.
This past Wednesday, the House Committee on Science and Technology Subcommittee on Research and Education held a hearing to address the NSB action plan.
Education policy is typically in the hands of the nation’s 14,000 local school districts, but according to Medill Reports, “concerns about the country’s lagging competitiveness in science education have created bipartisan support in Washington for a national plan.” Dr. Steven Beering, Chairman of the NSB, noted at the hearing that reaching consensus between those thousands of local boards on STEM education would be unimaginable.
Math and science scores for U.S. students are abysmal in comparison to other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries (see Marc Pearl’s column). Rep. Vernon Ehlers (R-MI), ranking Republican on the subcommittee, introduced a bill (H.R.325) in May that would implement “rigorous and voluntary American education content standards in mathematics and science” (Via the Chronicle).
The primary recommendation of the NSB report is the creation of a non-federal “National Council for STEM Education” to coordinate education programs through the country. The report also includes the following recommendations:
- The President’s Office of Science and Technology Policy should create a standing Committee on STEM Education within the National Science and Technology Council.
- The Department of Education should create a new Assistant Secretary of Education, who will coordinate that department’s STEM education initiatives with others.
- The NSF should create a national road map for primary, secondary, and collegiate STEM education.
The National Council would then coordinate a massive effort to define coherent STEM curricula, develop metrics to test student learning, strengthen the linkage between K-12 and college science and math education, and increase the number of qualified teachers in STEM classes through professional development and competitive compensation.
For coverage: Medill Reports, Chronicle of Higher Education (subscription), WCFCourier, Education Week.
Comments on this article
