- Enabling Economic Recovery Through Innovation
- The Top 12 Science Progress Features of 2008
- Breaking: Physicist John Holdren Is Likely Pick for Science Advisor
- Looking for a Research Bailout
- Want to Work Together? The Impact of Multi-University Collabortion
- “The Single Most Effective Way to Prevent the Transmission of Disease”
- Chu Is Bringing Science Back
- National Research Council: Nanotech Safety Needs a Closer Look. Much Closer.
- Neuroscience Everywhere
- Change for America on Science and Tech Policy, Part 4: The Office of Science and Technology Policy
- CNN Decides It Can Cover Science Without Dedicated Science Reporters
- Stem Cell Recommendations for the New Administration
Bush: Science vs. Ethics or Scientists vs. Ethics?
Dr. Elias Zerhouni
In an interview with the magazine Medline Plus, NIH director Dr. Elias Zerhouni repeats his call for more embryonic stem cell research. Dr. Zerhouni has made similar statements before, including during congressional testimony in March.
When confronted with this disagreement with its policy on the part of its chief medical adviser, the White House has offered the typical non-denials—”No, there’s no disagreement, we both think embryonic stem cell research should proceed”—without confronting Zerhouni’s point that the research is hobbled by the current policy.
Also familiar is the spin that this is a matter of science versus ethics, a line the president used in the 2004 presidential debates. Now the administration has gone further.
The notion that scientists lack ethical judgment—they’re only trying to cure horrible diseases after all—surfaced more clearly than ever in the reported White House response to Dr. Zerhouni’s latest statement. According to the Washington Post blog The Sleuth, spokesman Tony Fratto said that the president must “draw the line in a different place than Dr. Zerhouni” because he has to take into account “moral and religious views.”
The change of tone is notable. The White House could have said, “Well, we just disagree and the president is the decider.” Instead, as its position has become more untenable the White House has moved from “science vs. ethics” to “scientists don’t worry about ethics.”
Fortunately, those benighted scientists and the rest of us have politicians to do that for us.
Comments on this article
Yeah, clearly the President and his administration has demonstrated their commitment to ethical behavior. Oh, except for the warrantless wiretapping, torturing prisoners, lying about the need to go to war, and a few other things…
October 18th, 2007 at 5:06 pmReligion has no place in either science or public policy. Period.
Anything else is both a violation of the Constitution and of common sense.
October 28th, 2007 at 12:33 am“Moral and religious views” HA
October 28th, 2007 at 12:34 amIt seems to me that history is repeating itself..religion also apposed the use of antibiotics,innoculations, it even apposed democracy, and the use of flouride. They were wrong in all of these and now they are dictating science policy to this administration. Everything mentioned above have a profound moral implication, and many were developed by scientists or people with a scientific mind.
December 11th, 2007 at 12:51 pm